The Invention of Lying: The Most Truthful Film in Years


Warning: The following contains spoilers from almost minute one. Sorry, but this is less a review and more of a discussion about the rather heady themes in this film. Just can’t be done properly without some facts. But I’ll keep the details as minimal as I can.

I’m sure that most people had the same reaction to the premise of The Invention of Lying as I did: sounds funny. Plus, I love Ricky Gervais and I adore Jennifer Garner. So I figured, going into it, watching this movie would be a good time. It’s strange now, to think back on that notion. The idea of a world without lies is comical enough, but the one man who suddenly discovers he can lie, that’s just gonna bring on the hilarity. However, the reality of the first part of this film is actually quite sobering, in an Idiocracy kind of way.

Sure, a world without lies seems like a great idea. But the ripple effects of it are actually kind of staggering. For instance, the elimination of the concept of the lie means a lot of other things are never really invented; fiction for starters. Imagine that! Fiction is the product of years of fables and myths passed on by bards and family lines. But if everything everyone says is the truth; such tales are simply never conceived and the modern forms of art disappear into the ephemeral winds. In this film movies consist of professional Readers who recite stories of history. That’s all there is. TV appears to be a collection of things like the History and Discovery Channels. The advertising (both TV and print) is reduced to little more than pleas for consumers to buy their products. And it is interesting to note that Coke and Pepsi still exist in a world where a TV spokesman, as played by the fantastic Jimmi Simpson, openly admits just how bad this stuff is for you. There are other things you don’t really experience in the world of Invention but you get a sense for how they must be altered from how we know them; music, art, books, greeting cards.

But it gets worse. When Gervais’ character first tries to explain to his friend what he’s invented, he struggles because the word “Lie” is not in the English language. Now think about that for a moment. How many other words don’t exist, in a world where nothing but the truth is ever told? Here’s a short list I compiled.

Wordle Image

Link to bigger version

I guess if everyone tells the truth then being truthful isn’t really a trait to be concerned with. But it also seems that kindness and discretion got lost with the rest of the words. I can only hazard that the writers are working from the assumption that extremely logical people often appear rude, and if you always tell the truth you really don’t have any choice but to be super logical. Which is, let’s be honest, hard logic to argue with.

Interpersonal communication takes on a very different tone in a world of absolute truth. Anyone who is unattractive and unsuccessful is simply a loser and doomed to remain one. This is demonstrated, quite heartbreakingly, by Jonah Hill’s portrayal of Gervais’ suicidal neighbor Frank. And who wouldn’t be suicidal in a world like this one? Every unattractive trait you have is pointed out to you regularly. Marriage is based on little more than genetic compatibility (so if you’ve got bad genes good luck). Laughter hardly exists for anyone – even the beautiful people. And every time someone asks “How are you?” you have to tell them exactly how miserable you are.

I think the saddest reality for me is a world where no one tells jokes; because when you think about it, jokes are usually just lies and exaggerations. This is another point driven solidly home by the supporting cast. And you’ll have several, “I didn’t know he/she was in this?!” moments while watching this movie. Imagine a world with guys like Louis C.K. and Phillip Seymour Hoffman, where being funny and talented writers/actors/performers isn’t an option. What happens to the kid who can’t be a class clown to deflect the scorn of his more socially capable classmates? Well, by this film’s notions, he’s a pretty miserable bastard. In fact, you almost think Phillip Seymour Hoffman is playing himself in his brief cameo as a rather sad bartender. But hey, at least Tina Fay, Rob Lowe, Ed Norton and Jason Bateman are OK, since they are good looking in addition to being funny and talented. Well, by OK I mean they still have decent jobs. They are also all total douchebags.

Naming things also gets interesting in honesty land. For instance, the old-age home where Gervais’ mother lives is actually called, “A Sad Place for Hopeless Old People,” and one of the first churches is named “A Quiet Place to Think about the Man in the Sky.” First churches you may ask? Of course, in a world without lies there is no such thing as religion. Well, at least not in the beginning. A rather simple twist of fate pushes Gervais’ character to do many things which greatly alter the course of humanity, and the creation of religion is probably the biggest (there is one arguably as big, but I’m not saying word one about that). And while I admit this part of the plot was quite obvious as it played out, it still resonated in a big way.

I’m sure some religious people find the theory offensive; that without lies religion would never have been born. But I find it a little off-putting that a world with absolute truth still produced a Napoleon Bonaparte, so they can just get over it.

When Mark (Gervais) tells the story that leads him to creating a rough form of Christianity, you really can’t blame him. One of the first things that Mark learns after he discovers this talent is that small lies can really make someone feel better. And in a world so full of honesty that one woman stands outside her office building telling strangers, “I just don’t want to go in there today. I just don’t, you know?” that little comfort can make a difference. The conversation – where Mark attempts to help the downtrodden Frank – makes you want to hug them both. And the scene when Mark first tells the story, which prompts him to bring religion to the masses, will make you weep for him in many ways. Deep down, he really just wants to help make the world a better place. I guess, in that way, he is very Jesus-like.

As someone who loves Gervais’ take on religion in his stand-up, I had to wonder just how much fun he had with the idea of himself as a prophet. But what I really loved about this part of the plot line is how Gervais owns up to the harsh truths of both religion and atheism. This film admits that having beliefs gives people comfort in their darkest moments, particularly the belief in an afterlife of comfort and happiness. But morality actually seems to suffer more with the introduction of religion, which is a rather harsh reality. Faith gives people an excuse to give up on a good life in this world, and being good for its own sake, focusing instead on the promises of the next life. But when you see the joy fill Anna’s (Garner) eyes, as Mark tells her the story of the afterlife, you understand why religion has such a profound effect. You also get a feeling for what things would have really been like for Moses on the mound. I’ll bet there was no crowd control in the desert.

Garner’s character is one of the most interesting, though on the surface she seems to be nothing but a vapid twit. But in a world like this one, where beautiful people’s primary obligation seems to be producing more pretty folks, you come to realize that she is 100% a product of her environment, like everyone else in this movie. Years of brutal honesty have trained the entire world to believe that, by and large, beautiful people are special and ugly people are losers. And neither group of individuals is even aware that there’s another way to be. Garner’s character struggles with the reality of her world and the twists that Gervais’ character creates but, as time passes, you empathize with her far more than you expect to. The world Mark shows her is one of happiness and fun, but it’s a world that makes no sense to her because it contradicts everything she knows to be true. And since False doesn’t exist (maybe on tests it still does), it’s no wonder she’s confused. But as her character develops she starts to wish she could see the world through Mark’s eyes. As her affection grows, and her reliance upon him to guide her gets stronger, she practically begs him to make something fictional a reality; that the Man in the Sky will miraculously make them as genetically compatible as they are emotionally. I would liken Anna to the ultimate template for all of the beautiful girls falling for the underachievers in romantic comedies. She says the same things they do, but in a far more brutally precise way. For the record, while Garner was wonderful and I have no desire to replace her, it would have also been really interesting to see Emily Deschanel in this role (I’m sure anyone familiar with her portrayal of Temperance Brennan would understand that motivation).

Every facet of this movie boggled my mind, and at the same time it was sweet, fun and endearing. The cast plays with this material masterfully, which is not surprising since it is just littered with comedic talent. The script is full of wonderful lines and hilarious conversations that can make you cringe while laughing – in the good way, not the penis stuck in a zipper kind of way. Even the set design and costumes seem to add to tweak reality of this new world. All the lines are very clean and the colors are carefully coordinated to maintain an eerie serenity. The score did a great job of keeping the tone of this film light and friendly, which helps with the spins caused by the subject matter. The editing and directing is also top notch. The pace of the film never feels rushed, nor does it drag on. Instead you are carried wonderfully from one incarnation of this strange new world to the next. And while this movie has a lot to say, it never fails to find humor in the moment. Whether it’s Stephanie March’s hilarious moment in the hotel for anonymous sex, the most amazing traffic stop you’ll ever see, or a home burglary that goes bizarrely awry.

For fans of Gervais in general, this is an easy sell. The jabs at religion and mass mentality are fun but not as judgmental as they could be. He also has a good time pointing out that honesty doesn’t require you to say every damn thing that forms in your brain. In this movie, it’s not just about telling the truth, it’s about telling the whole truth all the time. I don’t think anyone, living in the world we’re in today, which consider that a good thing. I’d say this film is also a good fit for any romantic comedy fan. The romantic element may not be the focal point, but it’s played out in a poignant and unique way that will elicit the appropriate number of jealous sighs. I’ve also advised my sis and her non-platonic flat mate to view this, based on his enjoyment of bizarre realities and anything that shows the world wouldn’t be an amoral cesspool if religion weren’t here to tell us how to treat one another. I’m expecting a “WTF!?” reply from my sister in the next few days.

Bottom line – this movie will make you feel, think and laugh; sometimes simultaneously. In my opinion, can’t do much better than that.

Big thanks to my Twitter buddy Jen_Hud for giving me some much needed editing help.

My (Not Entirely Biological) Ticking Clock


Like many woman, when I was a little girl one of my dreams was to get married and have children. In fact, by the time I was 14 I had a good idea of how many kids I wanted. The magic number was 4. Ideally, I wanted to start with a girl, have a set of fraternal twins of each gender, and finally have a little boy. I guess, even back then, I knew I wanted to experience pregnancy and labor as little as possible. And yes, I even had ideas about my dream wedding, and my dream husband. But I was never so prosaic as to dwell on any of the ideals. I just knew the basics of what I wanted. I wanted a husband to be a partner, friend, lover and co-parent. And I wanted to be a mother.

Now not everyone has these desires, and some ascribe those desires to media shoving in women’s faces that it is what they should want. I, personally, think that’s pretty silly. The media is always more of a reflection of what we desire, then someone trying to tell us what to desire. For instance, the media doesn’t tell us all people should have certain markers for aesthetic beauty, it reflects those markers we have chosen (right or wrong). And if you think I’m wrong about that, you haven’t spent much time living outside of the norm. But I’ve lived most of my life outside of it, and while I’ve always had ambitions that involve career and success, my dreams have also included a family.

So here I am, 35 years old, and every time I see an adorable baby, I feel this little stab inside of myself. Some would say it’s the old biological clock ticking down, but I finally realized it’s about more than that. It’s about the ideals I had, just how far I’ve missed them by, and that time is running out to even come close.

There were two women in my birthing class, when I had my son. They were both around 40. One had a 18 year old and the other had a 16 and 20 year old. They were both pregnant with twins. Personally, I thought they were both a little nuts. The idea of starting all over, when the work of raising a child was almost behind them, seemed insane. I made a decision then, and I haven’t really wavered much on it since then. 40 is my cutoff. Which is why I only have 5 years left to have more children, and it’s one of the reasons for the pangs I’ve been feeling.

But it’s more than just having more kids, or having any specific number of them. It’s about doing it differently, and having it be different. I love my son, and I wouldn’t give him up for anything, but having him wasn’t easy. In fact, it was rather horrible. Let me explain (and warning, some of this is going to be slightly gross).

When I was pregnant with my son, I spent 9 months incredibly ill. I got sick every day, at least once, and usually more often. At the time, I didn’t have medical insurance, so I was forced to deal with the OB/GYN assigned by Medicaid (before IL had Healthy Kids/Healthy Parents). He didn’t much like women on Medicaid, which I heard from multiple women before and after I knew him. So, despite the fact that I once called him at 3AM and told him I’d been sick 8 times in 8 hours, and I was now seeing little bits of blood in the toilet, he still refused to do anything about my excessive ‘morning sickness’. You’d think he would’ve prescribed something after the 3rd month, when I’d lost about 30lbs, but he just kept saying we’d wait it out.

That summer was also one of the hottest on record, which didn’t help my comfort level. But I did get really good at planning bathroom trips. I knew to make sure there was nothing in my shirt pocket, make sure my glasses were off, make sure my hair was back, what angle to approach the toilet to avoid splashing, and I even got to the point I could hold it until public bathrooms were empty so no one had to listen to me. I became one hell of an expert at losing my lunch with as little muss and fuss as possible. I also learned what foods I couldn’t risk eating, on the chance they came back up. I’d never imagined how painful it is to regurgitate raisin bran.

Then there was the fact that I was single, without much money, and dealing with a lot of stuff at once. It didn’t get easier when I decided that my ex was no longer coming to my parenting classes with me, and I started taking my mother instead. I really had debated on doing that, but I was just too frustrated to do anything else, when he refused to just shut up for more than 5 minutes during the first class, and explained to all the other participants the proper way to relax your ‘woman’ with a pelvic massage.

The night I was sick 8 times, I was working at a store out of town. I’d spent 3 years working for an inventory service, and I was coming up on management level by that point. Or I would have, if not for the fact I had to quit when Michael was born. There was no way I could raise a baby traveling 80% of the time, and working insane hours that no daycare (even in-home) would deal with. But I kept working right up until the holiday slow down in November/December. In fact, when I found out I was pregnant, I was doing “Walmart Weeks” in Missouri. What does counting a Walmart involve? It involves 4 hours of work (almost entirely on your feet or knees) an hour lunch, and then working until it was done, generally 8-10 hours later. I did that for 2 weeks. Luckily for me, the nausea hadn’t turned fully in regurgitation at that point. I also took some temp jobs while I was pregnant. One week I’d worked nearly 80 hours between both jobs. That was the same week Michael’s father told me he’d quit his part-time job at a fast food place, because he couldn’t deal with the stress. As you can imagine, I was a little pissed.

Which is one of several reasons that things got really tense between us, by the time Michael was born. In fact, I told him a few weeks before I gave birth, that I wasn’t going to call him from the hospital until after the baby was born. Some might think that was cruel, but I stand by that decision. We were arguing all the time, and I knew (from family history) that the odds were labor would be hard. I told him I needed to focus on keeping myself calm and as comfortable as possible, and having him there meant that was unlikely. Unfortunately, my sister changed the outgoing message on our answering machine, to inform everyone that we were at the hospital. He didn’t get there until a couple hours after Michael was born, but it was still a bad situation.

I moved into a low-income apartment in November. It was a nice place, in a nice neighborhood, and I was relieved (there are some scary ‘projects’ neighborhoods in this area). But it was also eerily quiet, and very empty. I didn’t have a computer back then, so I had little contact with the outside world. Hell, I didn’t even have cable.

I first started going into labor on December 30th. The contractions were uneven, jumping around between 5 minutes and 15 minutes apart. They weren’t Braxton-Hicks either, they were real contractions, they just wouldn’t become consistent. Finally, about 1AM on December 31st, they were always less than 7 minutes apart even if they still jumped around, so I called my mom to take me to the hospital, during an ice storm. They sent me home a few hours later, telling me to come back when they were consistent. Almost 24 hours later, trying to sleep between them on my mom’s couch, I woke her and said I was finally sure I was ready. This was confirmed about 10 minutes later, when my water broke. That’s when things got really bad.

Every time I had a got done having a contraction, I threw up. Which also meant I couldn’t sleep between the contractions. So I hadn’t slept in days, and I was throwing up so much that I left the hospital 30lbs lighter than when I arrived. Michael was only 7lbs. The rest, the doctors told me later, was due to dehydration from getting sick. I don’t know how many hours it went on, before they finally gave me something. It was a combination of something for the nausea, something to take the edge of the pain (though I never noticed any change) and Pitocin to move the labor along. Despite the Pitocin, he was still born almost 20 hours later. I did count myself lucky, since my mother had been in hard labor for 48 hours with me, and hospitals just won’t let you go past 24 hours anymore.

I can’t remember much about that night. I hadn’t had any real sleep in three days. I was basically a zombie, just doing what they told me to, and trying not to throw something heavy at the uber-bitch nurse who kept telling me I had to quiet down whenever the doctor checked my dilation. I think I might’ve told her to go to hell at one point, but I’m not sure. All I know is, whenever he checked, it hurt so bad I wanted to die.

I don’t remember anyone asking me if I wanted drugs. I took the classes, but they weren’t Lamaze, just birthing classes. They made a point to tell everyone that they had to decide for themselves if they needed pain killers. All I know is, other than that one early shot, I never had any, and I don’t remember anyone asking me if I wanted them. But like I said, I was something of a zombie. I barely remember actually giving birth at all, but I do remember when they gave him to me and he almost instantly stopped crying.

A couple hours after Michael was born, his father showed up. I told the nurses to ask him to come back in the morning. I could barely keep my eyes open enough to nurse the baby, much less have a conversation. It was probably an hour later, when the nurses asked me to please talk to him, because he wouldn’t leave and he was creeping them out pacing the hallway. I talked to him briefly, let him come in and see the baby, and then begged him to leave and let me get some sleep. He was pissed, and that’s when the paranoia really started.

I read about post-partum depression in my birthing books, but I guess it wasn’t something I concerned myself overly with. From my mom’s experiences, I knew the nausea was going to be bad (she was medicated for it though) and labor was going to be tough (which is why she made dad get clipped when they wouldn’t tie her tubes after my sister). That’s what I was focusing on, along with all the busy work involved in preparing for a baby. So when the symptoms started, I didn’t even know it was happening.

The first morning at the hospital, when the ex called, I learned the meaning of fear in a way I’d never known it before. I don’t know if it was his attitude in general, the comments he made for years about being able to disappear off the grid whenever he wanted, or just the hormones, but I was terrified. I called my sister, begging her to get there as soon as possible, and I never let the baby out of my site. I even rolled his little bassinet into the bathroom with me, when I couldn’t wait any more. And when the ex showed up, and asked to take the baby into the hallway so his new girlfriend could hold him, I categorically refused.

Between exhaustion, pain and hormones, the couple days in the hospital was a nightmare. Just doing the birth certificate was a trial, because the ex was absolutely livid that I was giving Michael my last name. I figured it was safer, in case he ever tried to run with the baby (which he had made some veiled comments about doing). When he left the room at one point, the hospital administrator tried to be really nice about it. She mentioned that she wasn’t aware things were so bad between us. I told her that my mother had suggested putting ‘unknown’ on the birth certificate. The nurse actually told me that there was still time to do that. Frankly, that made me feel 10 times better, because I knew it wasn’t just me that was concerned with his behavior. All the nurses, at some point, express concerns over his presence and attitude.

When I first went home, I went to my mom’s, because the whole family was helping her move into her first house. It was ok then, even if I barely got to hold the baby because everyone else wanted their turn. But when I went back to my apartment, it really got awful. I was still so tired, and he wouldn’t sleep for more than an hour at a time. I didn’t find out until a day or two later, that the problem was my unproductive breasts. I decided to nurse for the first six weeks, because it was better for the baby’s immune system, and then go to bottles. But while most women’s breasts stop making colostrum and start making milk within a day, mine didn’t. In fact, no matter what the lactation consultant (assigned by the hospital) told me to do, I never got actual milk to develop. So he was crying because he was constantly hungry. I stopped nursing entirely by day three.

I think it was about a week after Michael was born that I had sort of moved onto my mother’s couch and he moved into his portable crib in her living room. I tried to go home to my apartment sometimes, but it was so hard. I was so scared all of the time. I even accidentally locked him alone in the apartment, because I was too afraid to leave the door unlocked while I went to get the laundry from the car (thank goodness I kept a spare key at Mom’s house). And then there was the crying fits that would just come on out of nowhere, and the panic attacks that were excruciating. At my mother’s house they were slightly less frequent, because there were people around to keep the paranoia from getting to me. But it was still awful. I was tired, sad, panicked and crying my eyes out for hours at a time.

I think it was about six weeks later, when my mom and sister insisted I get some help. Since I didn’t have real insurance, I had to go to the local Mental Health hospital. It wasn’t fun. I told the admin nurse that I was a ‘cutter’, because I hadn’t heard of such a thing, and when she asked, “Do you ever cut on yourself?” I thought she meant verbally. I basically thought she was asking if I was ever harsh on myself, which I could be occasionally. Fortunately that was cleared up a second later, when she asked, “Where on your body do you cut yourself?” They had a waiting list for people who weren’t in immediate physical danger from whatever mental disability they had. I explained that, by the time I’d gotten to the top of the list, the hormones would probably have taken care of themselves. They bumped me up, and I was assigned to a shrink who’s accent was so thick I literally understood every 5th word he said. But, he prescribed me an anti-depressant and pills for the panic attacks.

It was probably at least 10 weeks after he was born that I really felt better, and a good six months until I was fully living back in my own apartment. The meds kept me from being a complete basket case, but I still had crying fits and couldn’t stand being alone for too long. The ex had seen Michael once, when I brought the baby to a McDonald’s to see him and his family. He called occasionally, but once my phone got cut off, I didn’t really hear from him until the next Christmas, other than at child support hearings. That’s when I realized just how much of a vindictive son of a bitch he could be, when he screamed at ranted at me, and then DCFS showed up on my doorstep a couple days later, saying they’d got an anonymous tip I’d left Michael alone in the car in front of the court house. He was in the car, by the way, but he was with my friend Beth and her daughter was in the car seat next to him. It was a nice day, and we’d been cooped up a lot, so she opted to sit in the car with the kids while I was in court.

Over the years, there have been four calls to DCFS on me, and none of them were founded. Three of them were anonymous (one was my apartment board b/c they’d come in to spray and they were freaked out about a jelly stain on the carpet I hadn’t had time to clean up), and each of those was clearly my ex. He also called Medicaid years later, claiming I was defrauding the system because we were living on the Iowa side of town and I was getting Illinois Medicaid (I was off TANF and foodstamps by the time Michael was 2). After they contacted me, they informed him that he would be in trouble if he made any more false claims, because the apartment the insurance company put us in after the house fire clearly qualified as a temporary emergency residence. Of course, that was after he’d filed for a temporary restraining order against me, two days after the fire, because I couldn’t provide a safe living environment, and I refused to let Michael go live with him until we had a new place to say. The judge pointed out that, between having tons of relatives in town, and the insurance company covering all of our living expenses while we looked for a new house, his request was completely unwarranted.

The ex and I have gotten to a relatively civil point right now, though there’s still the occasional problem. For instance, when I screwed up his plans by dropping the kid off to him 10 minutes late one day (he’s constantly late picking up/dropping off), and he started screaming at me in the alley behind his house. But that’s mostly stopped now. It might’ve had something to do with my getting in his face a few years ago, and telling him he wasn’t my fucking father and so he couldn’t talk to me like he was, even if I refused to do something the way he wanted. Plus, every time he yells, I walk away or hang up the phone. I spent too many years that way, taking his tirades, and refuse to do it anymore.

So what is the point I’m getting at? What does all of this have to do with the pangs I feel almost every time I see a baby? It has to do with memories that I can’t get rid of but maybe, just maybe, I can push back with happier ones.

I want to meet someone who will be an actual partner; not someone who will spend 3 years dissecting me until there’s little left by an empty shell, not someone who’ll argue with the ultra-sound tech on whether that little shadow is really a penis instead of just being happy at seeing his child on the screen, not someone who thinks that responsibility is buying a pair of tennis shoes because the kid’s old ones have gotten really dirty and grungy (never mind the dozens I bought when he was outgrowing them every 6 months), and not someone who’ll call and rant at my pediatrician (one of the most respected in the area incidentally) in the middle of the night because she diagnosed our son with ADD and any perceived deficiency in his child reflects on him and therefore can’t possibly exist. I want to find someone who’ll want to share the experience of having a child with me, and find joy in it together, not act as if he’s some parenting expert and I’m an idiot for not agreeing with everything he says. And I want to make the choices I believe in for my child, without worrying about whether his father will drag me into another legal battle because he doesn’t agree.

I want to spend 9-10 months enjoying the anticipation of having a baby, without feeling so sick that it’s more torture than fun. I want to have someone in my life to take just a little care of me, so that taking care of my baby doesn’t feel like it’s killing me physically and emotionally. I want to watch an ultra-sound with a man who’s overwhelmed with joy at the site of his child inside of me, so we can have that joy together. I want someone holding my hand when our baby is born, who tells me he loves me, and makes me feel less afraid. I want to have a doctor who cares more about my and my child’s health and wellbeing, more than he cares about his own personal politics or views of anyone using state aid, even if only briefly. And I want someone by my side, who’ll fight for me to have exactly that.

Bottom line, I want to have another baby because this time I want to do it right. I want to have good stories to share, about bringing a child into this world, not horror stories that make people cringe. I want to have another baby because, 14 years from now, I want to look back on the experience with happiness not tears.

I love my son dearly, and like I said, I wouldn’t undo having him for anything. But truthfully, having him wasn’t an experience I remember with much fondness. It was more than a year of pain, illness, sadness, feeling desperately alone, and sometimes debilitating fear. And it makes me just a little bit angry. My mother and sister have done what they could over the years, so I’ll never claim I didn’t have any help and did it entirely on my own. But when it came down to it, the only person who was ever responsible for my son was me. Just once, I’d like it to not all be on me. I’d like to share the job with someone else, someone who wants to make a family together; me, him, Michael and maybe a couple more.

I know that hormones are probably a little at play in how I feel, but I learned the hard way how to recognize their influence. I know, now, that it’s more than that. I know, now, that what I really want is a chance to be more than just a mother. I want a chance to be part of a family that takes care of each other. And I want to show my son what it feels like to have a family like that. Hell, I’d like to show myself too, since I have fairly limited exposure to it myself.

And you know what else? I don’t think there’s a damned thing wrong with what I want. My mother rolls her eyes at me, when she hears me mention wanting another kid. Somehow she mistakes the desire for a willingness to do the single parent thing again. But she’s wrong. I would never do it alone again. Well, maybe if I somehow became insanely wealthy so I didn’t have to worry about lousy doctors and living in a too-quiet little apartment. But what are the odds of that?

No, I won’t do it on my own again. But that’s OK, because I never wanted to do it alone to begin with. I did what I had to do, which is pretty much the theme of my life. But, if I did meet someone before the big 4-0 hits, I think I’ve realized now that I really do want another chance to have the kind of childbearing experience I can remember with a smile instead of a tear.

The Way into a Stubborn Bitch’s Heart


So I’ve been writing rather feverishly the last couple of days, on a self-help book of all things! Actually, at the most you’d call it a pseudo-self help book. It’s really just a funny bit of insight into myself and other women I’ve met with similar natures. I’ve already written 7 chapters, and have headings for 5 more ready to go. I can’t believe how much fun I’m having doing this. And I think it’ll be both cathartic and an interesting read.

I’ve been reluctant to share anything of it, until it was a little more formed. But it’s coming along very well now, and I’m ready to show you a little bit. So read below, an excerpt from “The Way into a Stubborn Bitch’s Heart.” And feel free to throw out any comments. I’d like to hear impressions.

Chapter 3: I Even Tried Complimenting Her On Her Shoes!

Yes, I have heard a man say that before. It took some effort not to shake him like the hysterical chick in Airplane.  Now don’t get me wrong. I am not going to pretend that some women don’t love their shoes. HBO did an entire TV show that proved it. But there are two glaring problems with this statement.

  1. If you’ve never heard a woman talk about shoes, odds are good she’s not too concerned with your impression of hers.
  2. Compliments are a mine field for both the stubborn bitch and her pursuer.

The stubborn bitch loves compliments, she really does. On the surface, she appears to loathe them, and she might even make you feel like a sissy kiss ass when you offer them. But in reality, what the stubborn bitch hates is bullshit. She doesn’t want you to tell her about how cute her shoes are, unless you are a shoe designer or have a foot fetish, because you couldn’t give a rat’s ass about her shoes.  A disingenuous compliment will lose you more points than you could ever hope to gain.

Now here’s a shoe compliment that could yield you something rare and special to receive from a stubborn bitch; curiosity.

I like your new shoes. They look more comfortable than the ones you usually wear. I always wondered if the other ones hurt your feet.

What’s this? Did this guy just express concern about my general comfort level on a day to day basis? Hmm, interesting.

Now, you might say that wasn’t much of a compliment, but if it’s a valid statement about her shoe wearing habits (and if it isn’t please don’t use it because you’ll look like an idiot), it doesn’t really matter. The point of a compliment should be to make the other person feel like you noticed something about them and wanted to make them feel noticed. This is a compliment that’s genuine. It comes from a place of consideration. And if you get her a foot massaging pillow for her birthday, you might just earn a smile of recognition (see Chapter 4), something else that’s key to the success of winning a stubborn bitch over.

Guest Blog Link: Rush Rushed to the Hospital; Others Rush to Judgment


Did a guest blog on TweetinCrazy, a site dedicated to insanity from both the #tcot (Top Conservatives on Twitter) and #tlot (Top Liberals on Twitter) crowd. Check it out.

Rush Rushed to the Hospital; Others Rush to Judgment

The REAL Threat of the Twilight Series: Idiots with An Air Of Authority


As a lover of the Harry Potter series from early on (not to mention countless other geeky past times over the years), I’ve gotten used to having people dismiss things I enjoy out of hand, because they presume they know all about me based on my tastes. It’s an unfortunate reality that even a geek will make fun of another geek, if they are into a piece of fantasy fiction they don’t find worthwhile.

But never have I been so sick and tired of having morons, who think they have sociology and/or psychology degrees, telling me (and millions of others) that they have unrealistic fantasies and lack the ability to enjoy fiction without wallowing in the hope that a gorgeous vampire with blond hair will show up to love them for eternity. But thus plays out the real-life Twilight saga.

Since Twilight first started developing the worldwide fandom it currently has, there have been countless articles talking about the negative effects of being a Twilight fan, and talking about the presumed psychosis the series causes. Next you’ll tell me that JK Rowling wrote Harry Potter to induct kids into witchcraft.

Fantasy fiction (and one could argue that ALL fiction is fantasy fiction) has existed for centuries, and never have I seen so many people claimed to know so much about it’s fans. But, as is so often the case with ‘idiots with an air of authority,’ they are talking out their ass. Fantasy fans are among some of the most intelligent and free-thinking people in the world, because they choose to see beyond the world we live in, to something more interesting and dramatic. But with a few exceptions, most of them are quite aware of the difference between that fantasy and reality. And this applies as much to new fans as seasoned ones.

But here’s some words you’ve never heard arm-chair critics put in the mouths of fans of old.

I just can’t seem to find a girlfriend who conveys the air of haughty authority I want, would lead a rebel team to rescue me from a gelatinous mobster, and that are up for wearing a gold bikini.

I try to make friends, but none of them are adorable flying aliens that are so devoted to me they get deathly ill if I catch a cold (and consequently so does a little daisy in a plotted pant). And my life just won’t be the same until I have a friend who needs me to rescue him from a well-meaning government quarantine and return him to his spacship.

You know, if I can’t find a man who will tell me he doesn’t “give a damn”, then carry me up a huge set of antebellum stairs in a giant hoop skirt, then what is the point of living?

Elizabethan Girl 1: Lysander is so much hotter than Demetrius.
Elizabethan Girl 2: Yeah, but Lysander is so bad ass. Demetrius was such a pussy.
Elizabethan Girl 1: Lysander had better hair!
Elizabethan Girl 2: Have you seen Demetrius’ washboard abs?!

Because the Twilight saga involves romance as a big part of the story line (though once again the Idiots presume it’s the only part of the story without even reading/watching), they presume girls/women aren’t able to separate fantasy from reality, or they are overindulging in the fantasy. Know what I have to say to that?

Screw you!

I was a teenage girl, not all that many years ago. I grew up reading Stephen King, Johanna Lindsey, Christopher Pike, Terry Brooks, etc. In fact, 90% of what I read could be qualified as fantasy and/or romance. And while (like any other avid love of fiction), I might’ve fantasized about being in on the road to the King’s Dark Tower, and even identified with Susannah (the one main female character in the series), no idiot ever accused me of having developed an unrealistic fantasy about living the mother of all road trips.

The world is full of people who have at least one geeky fascination (in some cases more than one). And 95% of these fans know the difference between fantasy and reality. They enjoy the fantasy, and escaping into a world full of endless possibilities, but certainly don’t bemoan their life because it doesn’t match what fiction portrays. And do you know what the presumption otherwise is? It’s insulting as hell.

So here’s a little tip for the authoritative idiots: grow up and get over yourselves. Just because you see a woman carrying a copy of a Twilight book doesn’t mean she’s stupid enough to be pining her romantic hopes on a brooding vampire or a hunky werewolf showing up to sweep her off her feet. Just like Star Wars fans aren’t judging their life based their lack of light saber or ability to use ‘the force.’

But of course, I’m a girl, and therefore my point is subject to my delusions, right? Well here’s some points from one of the worlds biggest (and I don’t mean that literally) male geeks; Kevin Smith. And in case anyone doesn’t know, his wife (the remarkable Jennifer Schwalbach), is a former USAToday reporter and staunch feminist. She’s a woman who has earned her air of authority, and her right to wear a Team Edward t-shirt, if she so desires.

A Story So Familiar: The Interview With Former Scientologist Jason Beghe


I came across a video tonight, that really took me by surprise. What shocked me most of all was just how much I could relate to the individual being interviewed. Particularly, when the man used to be a Scientologist.

His name is Jason Beghe. He’s an actor, and he’s done a lot of voice over work. He’s one of the “That guys.” You’ve seen him in countless roles (mostly as guest TV appearances) but never knew his name. He was a Scientologist for 11 years. He was a big part of the organization and did a lot of work on their recruitment and other videos. And one day, after a long process of disappointment and disillusionment, he realized what he was doing and got out.

Now I’ve never subscribed to a religion or faith with any level of vehemence. Like Jason talks about in the interview, I spent my youth reading about different things, and sort of trying them on. But nothing ever moved me, and I’d like to think nothing could’ve ever caught me up the way it did Mr. Beghe and countless others; but then again, my history tells a different story.

And that’s why this interview truly struck me hard. As Jason talked about the methods and mindsets of the ‘church’, and what he feels drew him to the fold, I heard familiar phrases. They are phrases that I heard from a friend a couple of years ago, which led me to explain to her what Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is, and why her story struck a chord.

Some people imagine that NPD is something of a joke. After all, we’re all a little narcissistic, right? Yes, we actually are. But NPD is more than just a general sense of self-awesomeness. I mean NPH may play a narcissist, but Barney Stinson is not what I would call NPD. [Ok, upon further review of the criteria, maybe he does.]

From the Wiki, here are some of the factors that lead to a diagnosis of NPD:

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
6. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
7. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

It is also a requirement of DSM-IV that a diagnosis of any specific personality disorder also satisfies a set of general personality disorder criteria.

For the record, my ex displays multiple instances of all 9 points in our three year relationship, plus bouts of Histrionic personality disorder, Antisocial Personality Disorder, and he was actually diagnosed Bipolar early in the relationship. And I can tell you, when someone displays signs of NPD (or similar conditions) and I hear the stories of their significant others, the similarities are never vague. Conversations, thoughts, feelings, even the courtship stories are often right out of the unwritten biography of my life. But it’s the big questions that really stick with you.

How did I let myself end up in this situation?

Why didn’t I see sooner, what the person was doing to me?

How much responsibility do I take for having let myself be manipulated and abused that way, and how much do I lay on my abuser?

These are the questions that come up every time. And they are also the same questions I heard Jason explain in his interview, about the environment he lived in as a Scientologist. And, even more revealing, the answers were also eerily familiar.

No matter what kind of abuse you’re suffering, the mental abuse is always a component. It’s the one thing all victims have in common; the emotional/mental toll of their abuse. For long term abuse victims, the methodology would seem different, depending on if physical and/or sexual abuse is also involved. But actually, it’s still the same kind of control; make the other person believe they need you.

No matter the type of long term abuse involved, the abusers goal is always to make the victim believe that they cannot leave without untenable consequences. The abuser fears being left, and so does everything they can to ensure their victim feels incapable of leaving. In some ways Scientology can be seen as the ultimate form of NPD, because it not only puts it’s followers into the position of being dependent on them for their souls/health/community, it instills in them the same narcissism that is the driving force of the organization. It creates more narcissists, who recruit new members, using the same forms of mental manipulation and abuse. And let me tell you something, the most common trait of a narcissist is their ability to charm by appearing ‘normal’ on the surface.

And so we see the real damage done by so called ‘religious’ groups who seek to dominate and control their followers, and worse yet, insist they have the cure for mankind’s ailments. People aren’t just indoctrinated. No, with old school cult brainwashing it was at least more obvious. People were clearly no longer using their own minds as they huddled in compounds full of crazy and kool-aid (forgive the alliteration). But the new form of cult is a much scarier prospect, because it has that Stepford element; they seem to be such happy, well-adjusted and productive members of society.

But regardless of it how it may seem to the outsider, regardless of how we want to tell ourselves it could never happen to us… the truth is most people are vulnerable enough at one time in their life. Like Mr. Beghe, I am not a stupid person. My intellect didn’t stop me from knitting my life to someone who hollowed me out and drug me around as a doll for a while. But some people are vulnerable a lot more often than that. Some people will never see the reality for themselves. And that’s why it’s so nice to know that victims of L. Ron Hubbard’s insane sci-fi novel are coming forward. Maybe they’ll convince some others to jump ship.

Here is the interview, if you’d like to see it. It was done by http://www.xenu.net/. An organization working to disseminate information about the Church of Scientology and all of it’s abuses.

Interwebz; input needed. Do I Bare It All?


Yeah, I know. That’s one overly sensational title. But tell me it doesn’t have this cool geek-girl cadence to it?

My habit of meeting people online has come to a new fork in the road, and I’m finding myself torn between two paths (no Frost jokes I beg of you). In the grand scheme of things, it’s might seem a silly thing to concern myself with. But then again, it could have a lasting impact.

So here’s the interesting pickle I’ve found myself in. I really like to think that anyone I’m somewhat connected with has read my blog, and might even continue to read it. I would read the blog of someone I was interested in getting to know better. In fact, I can’t imagine not Googling a potential new friend at some point. If they have a username that’s not overly common, you can get a lot of insight into another human being. But then the issue becomes… do I still talk about what’s happening in my life, in my blog? Do I talk about how I’m feeling about each relationship I have, and discuss my pros and cons list, where I’m almost hoping they’ll eventually read it?

On the surface, the answer would seem clear; of course not you idiot!

But it takes more thought than that. I was reading an article today, about successful blogging. It made some great points, but as I read, I realized; it’s not what this place is about.

Now this blog is actually an amalgam of several blogs over the years (ok there are still some posts I haven’t moved, I’ll get to it!). But there’s a reason I did that. It’s become about the journey I’ve been on for close to 10 years, and the journey’s I hope are ahead. I never cared about this becoming a successful blog. I never yearned for ridiculous numbers of readers. I just wanted to have a place to talk about the things that matter to me, and about the ways in which I see the world, and hopefully make a few people think and laugh a bit. I don’t really talk about the sites stats often, but in all honesty, it gets more traffic than I ever anticipated it would. That’s a pleasant reality, but nothing that makes me ambitious for world wide web domination.

At its core, this blog was always intended to be about me. While I go off on a lot of tangents, you’ll notice I’m usually in there somewhere. It’s not a narcissism issue, I assure you (and anyone who knows me will nod along emphatically and whisper “insecure nutjob” when I look away). It’s because this is my home. CleverTitania.com, and by extension the Rants and Ramblings blog, is my place. It’s where I come to muse, to share, to express, and to release the parts of me that are silenced too often. Or perhaps I should say, the parts of me that have no one to talk to in the real world.

Which brings me back around to the topic at hand. Because, while I have no reason to think that a relationship with someone I can relate to fully would end the need for this outlet, frankly if I had to choose between finding that individual and this blog… well, maybe I’d stop in from time to time for a bit of a chat. But I do want to find someone who inspires and infuriates me into having even more to say. I want to find someone I can really talk to and about. I want to write about a whole new side to life, from a fresh and renewed perspective (that being the opposite of being single).

So I have to decide. Do I talk about all the things that matter to me, including any potential relationships? Or do I keep mum, and not risk scaring or spanking them off?

Ok, yeah, that sounded kinda dirty. But the question remains, and frankly, I’d love to hear some opinions. Constructive ones only please.

A Blog Bubble…or Wordle I guess


Compliments of http://www.wordle.net A fun little visualization of words I’ve that have been part of my vocab.

http://www.wordle.net/

Throw This One On the Michael Moore Stack


Michael Moore is a difficult guy to have as one of the voices of the liberal movement. There are some who take issue with his own methods and solutions. But sometimes, he really nails a point on the head. And here is a great example. His letter to President Obama, regarding the possibility of a troop surge to Afghanistan, made some incredible points. I recommend reading it before you read on.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mikes-letter/open-letter-president-obama-michael-moore

I decided that I at least wanted my voice added to this issue, and had intended to just write a quick email to the White House, indicating how my feelings echoed Mr. Moore’s. But that’s not what I ended up writing. Because, in truth, there have just been too many decisions lately that I don’t understand. And that fact is what’s really making me angry.

Remember the old days, when you’d see some statement from the White House, and you’d think, “What the fuck is Bush thinking?!” Now stop for a moment and ponder this, how many times have you thought the same thing about Obama recently? More than you’d care to admit, right? Particularly if, like me, you voted for the man.

I’m tired of feeling like we’re once again locked outside the cone of silence, wondering what’s really going on. Transparency goes so far beyond sharing statistics. It comes down to taking the time to make sure the American public knows why its government is doing the stuff it’s doing. Because until we have that window, until we have some semblance that our leaders are doing what we pay them to do, this country will always be divided and broken. It is the very lack of transparency in this administration that has everyone up in arms, liberal and conservative alike. Because it causes unpleasant flashbacks.

You know, like when you’re new boyfriend/girlfriend does something that reminds you why you left the last one.

So here is what I ended up writing to the President (or his staffers rather). It’s short (shocking I know), but I think it makes my point. And I think it makes a point that even tea baggers and birthers can’t argue with.

Mr. President et al.,

Mr. Moore, whose letter I’m sure has already been reiterated repeatedly, has done an exemplary job of putting forth my frustrations at recent choices by the White House. I feel no need to rehash his points, but I would like to add one additional thought.
Michael Moore doesn’t know everything about the state of the world’s security. And I’m quite sure I know even less than he does. We all recognize that there may be things that the public isn’t privy to (even some with good reason), that are impacting the choices you make. But I implore you to consider this.

If the information isn’t safe for public consumption, it is even harder to swallow the consequence.

Some of us screamed into the void as the last administration stripped away our rights based on information we didn’t have. But at least they said they had it. At least they admitted they had facts they were keeping from us, even if we doubted their word.

I won’t pretend I have the information or knowledge to plot the best course of action to take in any foreign military engagement. But I’m a pretty intelligent woman. If you take a moment to explain yourself, I’m sure I can follow along.

If there are pieces of the puzzle you can’t fill in, tell us what you can. If you truly believe that sending more young men and women into this situation is justified, give us some explanation. I want to see you, with your visual aids assembled, tell me what you are hoping to accomplish and when you expect to accomplish it. Do it in the Oval Office. Grab a big conference room. I don’t care. Don’t give me a speech; give me a lesson in military strategy. I’m not asking for maps of who’s being sent where. I’m not expecting anything that is going to give combatants an advantage. But there must be a way to break it down for me, so that I feel some sense you have a plan with a chance of success.

I don’t know what you know, Mr. President, and I probably never will. But I truly believe that, if you are not capable of performing this one service to the legions of individuals who voted for you, and you still order more troops into Afghanistan, you are not the man we thought we were hiring.

Thank you for your time,

Katherine…

Paranormal Activity: How the US is being haunted by puritans


Ok, the titles a little hokey today, I admit it. But honestly, how often do you write something that so lends itself to a title like that? And besides, it really is the truth. Our puritanical past is haunting our present and threatening our future.

Oh an IMDB forum today, I came across a post that really unnerved me. The OP (Original Poster for those who always wondered) was deeply concerned that a preteen actress had been exposed to suggestive language by playing a sexually precocious movie roll. I’ve seen the scene. It’s hilarious. And having grown up watching movies like Blue Lagoon, insanely tame.

Here is the position of the people still possessed by the ghosts of the puritans who first colonized the US. Children should be hidden from all things sexual, because it will encourage them to having sinful thoughts and do sinful things.

Here is the reality. Sexual development begins at age 2 (What is Normal Childhood Sexual Development?). If you ignore it, or try to hide it from your child, they are less likely to feel they can get real constructive input from you, when they really begin exploring the idea of having sex. They are also less likely to make smart informed choices, and to have the necessary respect for their body to know when they are ready to become sexually active.

These are not theories either. They are statistically traceable facts. It’s long understood that the general European consensus on children’s exposure to sex is very different from that in the US. France, in particular, has a much more open-minded approach. Now look at some statistics from a 2002 study.

Teenage birth rate per 1,000 births

* Sweden — 7
* France — 9
* Canada — 20
* Great Britain — 31
* United States — 49

Percentage of women aged 20-24 who had a child before age 20

* Sweden — 4%
* France — 6%
* Canada — 11%
* Great Britain — 11%
* United States — 22%

Percentage of women aged 20-24 who had first intercourse before age 20

* Sweden — 86%
* France — 83%
* Canada — 75%
* Great Britain — 85%
* United States — 81%

Percentage of women who began having “sex” before age 15

* Sweden — 12%
* France — 7%
* Canada — 9%
* Great Britain — 4%
* United States — 14%

Percentage of sexually active women aged 18-19 who were sexually active in the past year and had 2 or more sexual partners in that time period (*measures not exactly comparable)

* Sweden — 43%
* France — 13%
* Canada — 24%
* Great Britain* — 30%
* United States — 49%

(*measures were for 16-19 year olds in Great Britain)
Contraceptive Use

Percentage of adolescent women who did not use any method of birth control at first intercourse*

* Sweden — 22%
* France — 11%
* Great Britain — 21%
* United States — 25%

(*statistics for Canada not available)

Percentage of adolescent women who did not use any method of birth control at most recent intercourse*

* Sweden — 7%
* France — 12%
* Great Britain — 4%
* United States — 20%

Here’s an excerpt from the column that is particularly applicable.

For example, the authors suggest that one of the reasons for cross-country variations in contraceptive use is the difference in societal attitudes toward adolescent sexual activity. Contraceptive services and supplies are available free or at low cost for all teens in the four developed countries other than the United States, and efforts are made to facilitate their easy access to such services.

And there’s the rub. The possessed-by-ancient-spirits people would have everyone believe that even teaching children about contraception and STD prevention (other than the abstinence methodology of course) is a recipe for disaster, causing more children to consider having sex and ruining their lives and their souls.

But these numbers tell the reality. In developed countries where they do not take this viewpoint, women are just as likely to have sex before the age of 20, but not nearly as likely to have sex before the age of 15, as their US counterparts. They are also less likely to use contraception responsibly.

And the teen birth rate numbers are absolutely astounding. Or rather, that we haven’t shaken off our forefather’s sexual outrage and done something to protect our children by now, that is what is astounding. Also, let’s not forget, if these young women aren’t using condoms, we also know they aren’t being protected from STD’s.

This quote is directly from a CDC report.

The data presented in this report indicate that many young persons in the United States engage in sexual risk behavior and experience negative reproductive health outcomes. In 2004, approximately 745,000 pregnancies occurred among U.S. females aged <20 years. In 2006, approximately 22,000 adolescents and young adults aged 10--24 years in 33 states were living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), and approximately 1 million adolescents and young adults aged 10--24 years were reported to have chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis. One-quarter of females aged 15--19 years and 45% of those aged 20--24 years had evidence of infection with human papillomavirus during 2003--2004, and approximately 105,000 females aged 10--24 years visited a hospital emergency department (ED) for a nonfatal sexual assault injury during 2004--2006. Although risks tend to increase with age, persons in the youngest age group (youths aged 10--14 years) also are affected. For example, among persons aged 10--14 years, 16,000 females became pregnant in 2004, nearly 18,000 males and females were reported to have sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in 2006, and 27,500 females visited a hospital ED because of a nonfatal sexual assault injury during 2004--2006.

Although the majority of negative outcomes have been declining for the past decade, the most recent data suggest that progress might be slowing, and certain negative sexual health outcomes are increasing. For example, birth rates among adolescents aged 15--19 years decreased annually during 1991--2005 but increased during 2005--2007, from 40.5 live births per 1,000 females in 2005 to 42.5 in 2007 (preliminary data). The annual rate of AIDS diagnoses reported among males aged 15--19 years has nearly doubled in the past 10 years, from 1.3 cases per 100,000 population in 1997 to 2.5 cases in 2006. Similarly, after decreasing for >20 years, gonorrhea infection rates among adolescents and young adults have leveled off or had modest fluctuations (e.g., rates among males aged 15–19 years ranged from 285.7 cases per 100,000 population in 2002 to 250.2 cases per 100,000 population in 2004 and then increased to 275.4 cases per 100,000 population in 2006), and rates for syphilis have been increasing (e.g., rates among females aged 15–19 years increased from 1.5 cases per 100,000 population in 2004 to 2.2 cases per 100,000 population in 2006) after a significant decrease during 1997–2005.

What does all of this tell us people? The ghosts of our pasts are not just affecting our lives right now, they are also going to ruin the lives of our children. It’s not shows/movies/music that talk about sex. That’s what the puritanical remnants would have you believe, but it’s simply not true. They are not the enemy. What we need to fight is how we deal with exposing our children to sex in general, and how open we are with them about their own sexual curiosity and inclinations. We need stop hiding sex from our children, or throwing our arms up in outrage when we find they’ve had the slightest bit of exposure.

Sexual responsibility has sometimes been equated with gun safety. Those of the ‘conservative wisdom’ would argue that comprehensive sexual education is like giving children a loaded weapon. But that theory is as bad as all their others. The gun is already loaded, and it’s already in the child’s possession. You can’t take it away, no matter what information you withhold from them. Sexuality is part of our physical make-up, and it’s not dictated by anyone’s agenda, neither conservative or liberal. Comprehensive sexual education is actually teaching the child how to transform their sexual identity from a dangerous weapon to a tool for their own advancement and evolution. And until we get that through our heads, it is our children who will suffer for our ignorance.